Call Now | (412) 981-2400
Birth injuries are often devastating, leaving families grappling with emotional and financial challenges. When these injuries result from negligence, determining liability can be a complex process. In many cases, the concept of comparative fault comes into play. This legal doctrine helps allocate responsibility among parties involved and directly impacts the compensation awarded to victims. Below, we break down the intricacies of comparative fault, its role in birth injury cases, and what families should know when navigating these claims.
Comparative fault, also known as comparative negligence, is a legal framework used to allocate liability among multiple parties in a lawsuit. In birth injury cases, it determines how responsibility for an injury is divided between healthcare providers, parents, or other parties.
For example, in a state with pure comparative negligence, a party can recover damages even if they are 99% at fault, though their compensation would be significantly reduced.
Tell us what happened. Just call to us.
Compensation in birth injury cases is meant to cover medical expenses, therapy, lost wages, and emotional damages. However, when comparative fault is applied, the calculation of damages becomes more intricate.
For instance, if a court finds that improper prenatal care by parents contributed 20% to a birth injury, the awarded damages will be reduced by that percentage.
Negligence plays a pivotal role in birth injury cases. It encompasses actions or inactions by medical professionals or parents that fall below the accepted standard of care, leading to harm.
Medical Negligence Obstetricians, nurses, or hospitals may be found negligent for:
Parental Negligence While less common, parental actions can sometimes be scrutinized, such as:
Proportional liability determines the percentage of fault assigned to each party. This is crucial in birth injury cases, where both medical errors and external factors may contribute to the outcome.
How Proportional Liability Works
Example Case Study
A family files a birth injury lawsuit, claiming $1,000,000 in damages. The court determines:
The family would receive $700,000 after accounting for their 30% fault.
How does comparative fault affect birth injury compensation? Comparative fault reduces the compensation based on the plaintiff’s share of responsibility. If a plaintiff is 25% at fault, they receive 75% of the awarded damages.
Can parents be held partially liable in birth injury cases? Yes, if their actions or inactions contributed to the injury. However, this is less common compared to healthcare provider negligence.
Who pays for damages in comparative fault cases? Liability is shared proportionally among the responsible parties. Each pays according to their percentage of fault.
Issues in Proving Fault Allocation
What is the statute of limitations for filing a claim? Statutes vary by state but generally range from 2-4 years after the injury or its discovery.
How does shared fault impact settlement amounts? Settlements are reduced by the percentage of fault assigned to the claimant. Insurance companies often use comparative fault as a negotiation tool to lower payouts.
Navigating the complexities of comparative fault in birth injury cases can be overwhelming. If your family has been affected, consulting an experienced medical malpractice attorney is essential. They can guide you through the legal process, ensuring you receive fair compensation while protecting your rights.
Take the first step toward justice—contact Matzus Law, LLC today to explore your options and secure the support your family needs.
Helping each and every one of our clients with tenacious representation when they need a strong and passionate advocate.